Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Voting Behavior - What Determines Vote Choice? Essay -- Politics Polit
Many political science researchers study the forces that drive the vote. One of the earliest, and nearly well known, books astir(predicate) election studies is The American Voter. Written in 1960, the book tries to explain a model that describes what drives Americans to vote the way they do. The model suggests that social factors determine ones ships company identification, which determines ones publish positions and evaluation of candidates characteristics. These forces all work together to determine how one will vote. This model may or may not still hold aline today, as political researchers are not in agreement as to what exactly drives the vote. One thing that does remain true, however, is that factors such as social groups, party identification, issues, and ex post facto evaluations all play some part in determining the vote. Although issues play a role in determining vote choice, social forces and retrospective evaluations are the most important factors the American publ ic takes into consideration when deciding who to vote for. Fewer Americans identify with a political party today- in 1992 astir(predicate) 39% of the American public considered themselves as Independents. Before the 1982 election only 35% reported that they were Independents. This suggests that party identification is on the decline despite the American Voter finding that most everyone had a party identification and that their identification did not change much over their lifetime. (Abramson, Aldrich, Rohde, 225) Many people change their stamp about an issue over time, and only feel strongly about a few issues. Because Americans lack the knowledge of politicians positions on issues, and lack opinions of their own for the most part, they rely on other factors when determining who... ...ming. Retrospective evaluations require little knowledge or time and anyone can evaluate the President and the economy jolly quickly. Issues are always going to be important to the few that actively support them, but for the most part we rely on social groups and party identification, or retrospective evaluations when an incumbent is running, to help us decide who to vote for. BIBLIOGRAPHYAbramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, David W. Rohde. Change and Continuity in the 1992 Elections. 1995. Washington DC congressional Quarterly.Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. The American Voter. 1960. New York Wiley.Erikson, Robert S., Kent L. Tedin. American Public Opinion. 1995. Massachusetts Allyn and Bacon.Luker, Kristin. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. 1984. Los Angeles University of California Press.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.